Failure of Structural Adjustment Programme

INTRODUCTION tally to Collin dictionary consecratement is the group of people who are responsible to govern country. Christian council of Tanzania and Tanzania Episcopal conference define politics as the pass agency for organizing and in the end of controlling both phylogeny and parliamentary law in the society. Also it is an organized body of persons and institutions that form an agency or machinery of the acres which formulates, expresses and realizes the will of state. on that pointfore, governing activity consists of the activities, methods and principles involved in the governing a country or early(a) policy-making unit.Government disaster is the world field analogy to grocery failure and occurs when a government discussion causes a more(prenominal) inefficient allocation of goods and resources than would occur with start that intervention. Likewise, the governments failure to intervene in a market failure that would issuance in societally preferable mix of o utput is referred to as unresisting government failure (Weimer and Vining, 2004). The failure is an outcome of policies enacted to regulate trade which take systemic inefficiencies and economic cost that adversely affect a reapings manu accompanimenture and sales.This arises when government has created some inefficiency because it would non have work a given problem or a set of problems more efficiently. The government bring out side failures largely conduct from principal/agentive role problems. Market failure occurs when the supply of a good or do insufficient to meet a demand. A market failure re crystalisent when white plagues pilenot achieve equilibrium because of some distortions for example, the limits on specific goods and services.In new(prenominal) words, government regulations executeed to promote companionable self-coloredsomebeing inevitably result in a degree of market failure. morphological fitting create mentally are economic policies which cou ntries must follow in order to curtail for new World assert (WB) and International M anetary storage (IMF) loans and back up them make debts repayments on the older dept owed to commercial banks, governments and World Bank, (Whirled Bank Group, 2003). THE measure up OF THE COUNTRY BEFORE STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT After independence in 1961, the new government adopted the colonial style of economic structure. in the midst of 1960 and 1962, for example kitchen-gardening contributed more than 50% to gross national output (GNP), and sisal, coffee, cotton and tea contributed 60% to the total contradictory exchange lolly (Taube 1992). Tanzania neglected not only to satisfy its own national feed requirements, but in any case to diversify its export products and promote light manufacturing. Politicians were briefly overtaken by the reality of severe deficiencies in the supply of food products, energy, housing, fabricate goods, health and educational services, as well as intermediat e inputs and implement for the agricultural sector.Between 1961and 1966 Tanzania economy operated primarily under waive market originators and the government adopted the World Banks transformation accession to agricultural development as a component of its prime(prenominal) fin year plan (Wenzel and Wiedemann 1989). In 1963 Tanzania implemented the Agriculture Product progress Act, which was the governments marketing board for scheduled crops. This board managed maize, wheat, rice, cashew nut nuts and oil seeds done market purchase, price regulation, and regulation of storage, bewitch and processing (Bryceson 1993).DURING ARUSHA DECLARATION In 1967, the ruling party (TANU) which nowadays is Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) passed the archetypal national economic declaration establishing Tanzanias era of economic socialism. This was the Arusha Declaration. This clear meant to address the deficiencies in Tanzanias economic development, but it explicitly enwrap socialism and a plan ned economy, which the countrys new leading(a) thought appropriate at the time. Ujamaa (familyhood and relationship) became the expression for Tanzanians social economic system and a synonym for Tanzania socialism.Through this self confidence approach, Tanzania forced its own withdrawal from global market. GOVERNMENT FAILURE Although Tanzania experience reasonable macroeconomic performance until the mid 1970s, unfavorable external conditions wiped out the previous economic achievements and led to the crisis period of 1980 1985 (Ndulu 1994). The justification for nationalization of mystical firms and extensive involvement of the state in productive activities was the ability of the state to control negative externalities, exploit economies of scale and operate firms at formally optimal level, the outcome proved otherwise for Tanzania.The government failure occurred in the future(a) ways The state owned cooperation turned out to be inefficient in almost all areas of their op erations. For example many an(prenominal) supply companies operated below standard such as National Milling Cooperation which was render food stuffs like maize, packed maize flour, rice and wheat cause full(prenominal)er demand in urban areas. Another company was regional Trading Company (RTC) for supplying commodities like sugar, soaps, wine from Dodoma, and these ca apply shortages of the commodities.Due to pretermit of fund from primal government health services, water, education (especially primary schools) remained a big problem in both urban and arcadian areas. The government operation in providing these social services was highly contributed by among other things inadequate foreign exchange as the country relied such(prenominal) on agricultural products which did not competed strongly with the same crops from other countries in the international market such as coffee from Brazil, cotton from Egypt and India. There was also the Tanzania Uganda war of 1978 1979 as muc h as national earnings was enjoin to the war.There was extreme weather conditions (drought or too much rainfall) leading to falling of local production in key food crops and high domestic inflation. These conditions contributed to severe scantness to most of the people since they depended on agriculture for their survivor. R. E. Stren adds that Tanzania faced a severe balance of payments originally caused by the locomote prices of imported oil. The rise of oil price resulted to the rise of prices of products as well as provision of social and economic services.Due to this the majority could not afford to access these services. Young (2003) argues that the government had been adamant that the buses she owned moderate their monopoly status, but the desperate economic situation and the existence of informal sources of dishonor forced the government to legalized the daladala in 1986. The owners of trucks and pickups were allowed to carry passengers for a fee if they ascertain a co ntract from the public transport authority and met dissimilar safety requirements.These situations led to Tanzania try her own economic reforms in early 1980s. These imply Nation economic Survival curriculum (NESP) in 1981 -1982, geomorphologic tolerance Program ( conk out) in 1983 1985. Due to these homegrown reforms, Tanzania adopted a series of donor supported reform programs starting in 1986. The first was Economic Recovery Program (ERPI), followed by the ERPII in 1989 1992. Despite all these efforts by 1980s Tanzania was the worlds second poorest country in bring in DomesticProduct (GDP). It is these economic crises and poor services delivery which forced most of sub-Saharan African countries to implement the morphologic revision Program ( sap) as a precondition to aids and loans from the International Monetary parentage (IMF), the World Bank (WB) and other donor agencies. In order to solve the persistent severe economic crisis which has been confronting Tanzania s ince the late 1970s, Tanzania signed an agreement with WB and IMF in 1986 to adopt SAP. SAP WITH MARKET FAILURE morphologic appointment program by World Bank and International Monetary Fund gave a new limited role for governments. No longer should the government supply services itself, instead the ultimate goal would be for the important government to serve in the role mainly educator, promoter and governor and communities in league with the private sector in that of provider. Structural adaptation program failed also in many countries including Tanzania because many stakeholders (countries) had little or no participation in making its policy.This means, these reforms had been imposed on countries that were incomplete ready nor had the capacity to implement them. According to Lugalla, Structural Adjustment Programmes had the following principles which had to be adopted There was devaluation of the local currency. That is the dollar gained more jimmy than the Tanzanian shilling. Due to this the foreigners who bought raw materials such as cotton benefited much as their currency was high. Also the government ended up in importing manufactured goods in higher prices resulting to low profits.The introduction of cost sharing in education and health. Before the introduction of these reforms the government used to provide these services freely, but now the people were forces to contribute. Due to this, many people could not access these services because they were not able to contribute. There was a policy of trade liberalization. This policy aimed that the government should allow free trade where the price of commodities was controlled by donor countries. There were frequent price changes which aimed at benefiting the foreigners and not the producers.Creation for conducive environment for foreign investments. The government had to put easy, friendly and flexible conditions that were more beneficial to the investors than the country. Introduction of democratisati on which is understood as multipartism. The government was under one party rein in but it was forced to adopt multiparty system as a condition to receive loans and grants. By 1992 Tanzania became a democratic state where different political parties such as Tanzania Labor Party (TLP), NCCR-Mageuzi, CHADEMA, Civil United preliminary (CUF) and others were introduced.Although the aim of Structural Adjustment Programme was said as to remediate the socio-economic problems of the country, it proved failure. Failure of the program in Africa is also basing on the fact that theres assumption that a uniform set of principles can yield successful policies for all countries irrespective of their differences. Failure of Structural Adjustment Program in Tanzania can be seen in Since Tanzania has been implementing social and economic reforms prescribed by SAP, social services are still a problem both in quantity and quality.The urban areas (cities and towns) has witnessed the problems multiplyin g rather than decreasing. mint have difficulties in accessing clean water, adequate shelter, better health complaint etc. Let us take Dar Es salute as example, theres frequent water cut which sometimes date areas dry up to a week, electricity problem in the whole country, overflowing sewage and hospitals without medicine especially public hospitals,( Lugalla). SAP forceful on reducing government expenditure on the unproductive sectors social development in urban areas in Tanzania.Lack of sufficient work out has do it difficult to finance a variety of urban development projects including the provision of adequate housing. As a result seventy portion of the urban creations live in poor houses without necessities such as sanitation and adequate garbage collection. For example areas like Vingunguti and Hananasif in Dar es Salaam are composed of slum settlement without proper sewage systems. SAP has reduced the health budget significantly. The state allocation budget for health is now estimated at less than five percent of the governments recurrent budget.Information from the ministry of finance shows that, every Tanzanian is currently expense five US Dollar a year to service foreign debts but spends only two US Dollars for his or her own health. A research from Dzodzi Tsikata from university of Ghana Legon, shows that SAP has much effect on women in Africa. SAP has exacerbated gender issue in, for example work places, wage differences amidst men and women are growing. For example in Tanzania and Nigeria, poor and middle gradation women are giving up formal employment for informal sector work because it pays more.SAP also due to its export promotion policy, has increase extractive activities such as logging and excavation leading to deforestation and mining pollution and the reduction of ordinary people. These failure of SAP in Tanzania and Africa in general has posed critic from individuals and leaders like the late J. K. Nyerere the first president o f Tanzania who tried to resist this program saying it was just for the capital letter consensus. Another critic was made by the United Nations economic burster for Africa that SAPs are too narrow, rely mainly on fiscal and pecuniary instruments and have little relevance to long-term development goals.Another failure is seen in agricultural sector following the devaluation of Tanzanian shilling. For example in 1986, the rate was 192 shillings per dollar this situation raised the price of imported inputs. This has resulted to poverty implication to the livelihood of farmers in the country. The removal of fertilizer subsidies had the effect of ski lift the price of fertilizers and therefore reducing profit. The removal of subsidies on maize repast is likely to have negatively affected urban consumers.However, under Structural Adjustment Programmes there was sound macroeconomic substantial exploitation in economy. The overall economic growth has been rising consistently from almost one percent in the mid 1980s to 6. 7 percent in 2004 (URT, 2005). A substantial improvement has been achieved due to adoption of various expenditure measures and processes including Public Expenditure Review (PER), Medium term Expenditure theoretical account (MTF) and Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). Conclusively Despite the setbacks, Tanzania has made tremendous progress on many fronts.However the remaining central challenge is making growth deliver more efficiently in terms of poverty reduction. The focus on this should be on accelerating growth of agriculture and rural sector development, to engender economic opportunities in rural areas where poverty remains pervasive. Equally important is the need to sustain risque growth, a necessary element to achieving the millennium development goals. Also since the lineage of economic reforms in 1986, a promising number of Tanzanias population has benefited from gradual poverty reduction.Understanding of the issues by wide r segment of society through debates and participatory approaches engenders broad ownership of the reforms. The government should insist on the various homegrown programs to ensure sustainability and credibility to citizens as they will feel responsible and responsible for their development. BIBLIOGRAPHY Bidyut Chakrabary and Mohit Battacharya(2003) Public Administration A Reader Oxford University Press. David Reed (1992) Structural adjustment and the environment.Economist Intelligence Unit (1995). Tanzania and the Comoros Gibbon, Peter and P. Raikes (1995). Structural Adjustment in Tanzania, 1986-1994. Center for outgrowth Research Copenhagen. Joe L. P. Lugalla Online Journal for African Studies University of newfangled Hampshire obtainable at www. africa. ufl. edu Sited on 16/12/2011. J. K. Nyerere (1973) Freedom and Development Dar Es Salaam Tanzania Printers. L. A. Msambichaka and A. Naho (1995). Agricultural Sector Performance Under SAP in Tanzania Promising or Frustrating Situation? in beyond Structural Adjustment Programmes in Tanzania Successes, Failures and New Perspectives. M. Bagachwa, F. Shechambo, H. Sosovele, K. Kulindwa, A. Naho and E. Cromwell (1995). Structural Adjustment and sustainable Development in Tanzania. World Wildlife Fund and Economic Research assurance University of Dar es Salaam. Moshi, H. P. B. (1995). Reforms and Economic Performance. Paper presented at the World Bank Conference Socio-Economic Growth and Poverty Alleviation in Tanzania, Arusha May 14-20 1995. Mshana, Rogate (1996). Structural Adjustment and feed Security in Tanzania. Paper presented at the Danida Food Security Workshop, Arusha, 18-19 November 1996. Richard E. Stren Ujamaa Vijijini and Bureaucracy in Tanzania Canadian Association of African Studies. gobbler Young (2003) In-African Politics Indiana University Press. United Republic Of Tanzania (2002) Country Overview Available at www. novelguide. com Sited on 15/12/2011. Whirled Bank Group (2003) Structural Adjustment Programme Available at www. whirledbank. org/development/sap. html Sited on 16/12/2011. .